This Week's Episode
Why Food Insecurity Still Exists in America
The United States has more than enough food in aggregate and one of the world’s most sophisticated food systems. Yet food insecurity persists year after year. The reason is not a single failure. It is a set of reinforcing pressures that keep many households one missed paycheck, one medical bill, or one rent increase away from running out of food.
This inaugural episode invites listeners to step back and look honestly at how our food system evolved. From the agricultural breakthroughs that made the United States a global breadbasket, to the birth of food banking as a way to distribute surplus, the system did what it was designed to do. But the world changed—and the conversation didn’t keep up.
Food Secure Nation exists to change that conversation.
About the Episode
This show begins with a simple but uncomfortable truth: food insecurity is something we created—and therefore something we can solve. Not with slogans. Not with blame. But with better thinking, better alignment, and better courage.
In America, 42 million people live with food insecurity. Not because we lack food—we waste nearly 40% of what we produce—but because access, systems, and priorities don’t line up. Hunger is visible. Food insecurity is quieter, more complex, and far more consequential.
Food insecurity touches everything:
- A child’s ability to learn
- A parent’s health and mental well-being
- A worker’s productivity
- A community’s stability
And yet, we often talk about it as if it’s someone else’s problem—or worse, a personal failure. It’s neither.
This is not a show about charity. It’s about responsibility. Not about guilt, but possibility.
Not about having all the answers but about asking better questions—together.
We believe dignity matters. Nutrition matters. Consistency matters. And solutions only work when they meet people where they are, without judgment. Solving food insecurity isn’t about doing more of the same; it’s about doing the right things, at the right level, with the right partners.
Our commitment is simple: to bring forward the evidence, the voices, the wisdom, and the urgency needed to prove that food insecurity in America can be solved—and to invite anyone who cares about their community, their workforce, their children, or their future to be part of that work.
Because hunger may be loud—but food insecurity is quieter, deeper, and more dangerous.
And when we know better, we can do better. That’s how we build a Food Secure Nation.
Know Better
What the numbers say (recent years)
- Roughly 12 to 14% of U.S. households (over 15 million households, about 40 million people) have experienced food insecurity in recent years.
- The rate rose sharply after pandemic-era supports tapered and inflation surged: 10.2% (2021) to 12.8% (2022) to 13.5% (2023).
- More than half of food-insecure households include a full-time worker, showing this is also a working-family issue.
SNAP participation reduces the likelihood of being food insecure by about 30%, but many eligible households are not enrolled, and benefits can fall short by month-end.
What it would mean to solve this
“Solved” means that every person can reliably obtain enough nutritious food in every season and region, including when shocks hit. In practice, that would look like:
- Food insecurity becomes rare, not cyclical. Rates do not spike with recessions, disasters, or policy rollbacks.
- Disparities narrow and then disappear. Households with children, single-parent families, and Black, Hispanic, and Native American households are no longer systematically more at risk.
- Support systems catch people quickly. Short-term hardship does not become long-term instability.
Why it persists: a system that reinforces itself
Food insecurity is best understood as a set of linked loops. Low resources reduce food purchasing power. Food insecurity then increases stress and worsens health, which can reduce work capacity and raise expenses, deepening the original problem. Safety net programs counteract this loop, but gaps in access, adequacy, and coordination limit their ability to offset the pressures fully.
The evidence points to a consistent set of persistent barriers:
- Low income and low wages: Households cut food first when money is tight.
- High essential expenses: Housing, utilities, transportation, and healthcare costs force trade-offs.
- Safety net gaps and shortfalls: Under-enrollment, eligibility limits, and benefit adequacy issues persist.
- Administrative burden and stigma: Complex processes deter enrollment and consistent use.
- Unequal burden across communities: Rates remain higher among Black, Hispanic, and Native American households.
- Physical access barriers: Distance and transportation can make affordable, nutritious food harder to reach.
- Fragmented governance: Programs seem to create gaps and diffuse accountability.
What’s changing now and the questions worth watching
Recent years have shown how quickly food insecurity can move when policy and prices change. Several changes are reshaping the landscape:
- Policy whiplash as a driver: What happens when temporary supports expire, and which supports become durable over time?
- The post-2021 SNAP benefit baseline is higher due to the Thrifty Food Plan update, but does it keep pace with local costs and end-of-month gaps?
- Summer nutrition: With Summer EBT beginning in 2024 and more states adopting universal free school meals, will child food hardship stabilize outside the school year?
- Access is evolving: SNAP online purchasing is now nationwide, but will delivery reach rural areas and households with limited digital access?
- National ambition meets local execution: The federal goal to end hunger by 2030 is a strong signal, but which actors are accountable for measurable progress and equity in outcomes?
Why this matters for the conversation
If food insecurity were only about food supply, it would already be solved. The hard part is the system: income, costs, access, program design, and resilience through shocks. Bring your view of what is most underestimated, what is working, and where the real trade-offs show up in practice.
Additional Resources
-
Podcast
54 min
-
Article
5 min read